Paraguay Investor Pass: a new fast-track to permanent residency for investors

Paraguay continues to advance its strategy to attract foreign investment. In this context, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, together with the National Directorate of Migration, has announced the launch of the “Paraguay Investor Pass”, a regime aimed at simplifying access to permanent residency for investors.

  1. What changes under this new regime?

Traditionally, the immigration process involved a prior stage of temporary residency. According to the authorities’ announcement, this new framework would allow those who meet the investment requirements to directly obtain permanent residency through a more streamlined and centralized process.

  1. Investment options

The program establishes different alternatives to qualify, targeting strategic sectors:

  • USD 150,000 in tourism projects
  • USD 200,000 in the stock market or real estate sector

  1. Announced benefits

According to official information, the regime provides for:

  • Direct access to permanent residency, without an intermediate stage
  • Access to the tax treatment applicable to residents, including a lower tax burden on dividends compared to non-residents
  • A mostly digital process, as reported by the authorities
  • Physical presence mainly required for the issuance of the national ID card

  1. Context

The launch responds to a clear context: Paraguay has been experiencing a sustained increase in interest from foreign investors.

With this program, the country aims to position itself as a more competitive jurisdiction in the region, combining:

  • Relatively low costs
  • An attractive tax framework
  • Simplified immigration processes

  1. Practical insight

From a practical standpoint, the regime seeks to facilitate the relocation of investors looking to structure their presence in Paraguay with greater predictability in immigration and administrative matters.

  1. Conclusion

The Paraguay Investor Pass represents a relevant initiative in the modernization of the immigration regime linked to investment. Its effective implementation and subsequent regulation will be key to assessing its practical scope and impact on attracting foreign capital.

This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific assistance regarding the application of this regulation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Structuring debt acknowledgments and payment agreements: the value of preventive and strategic legal advice

In many cases, debt disputes do not begin in the courts. They begin with poorly structured or insufficiently documented agreements.

In disputes involving credit and financial obligations, the advice of a lawyer who understands the client’s business and is familiar with the various legal alternatives available is essential. When difficulties arise in the debtor’s performance of an obligation, it is important for the creditor to know the various options available before resorting directly to the courts.

In this context, where there is willingness on the part of the parties, one possible alternative is to restructure the credit so that the new terms reflect the current economic reality of the transaction and allow for effective performance of the obligation.

Many credit-related disputes end up in court. Experience shows, however, that a large share of these disputes could be handled more efficiently through proper preventive legal advice and the correct structuring of payment agreements.

Such instruments allow, on the one hand, the creditor to recover its credit and, on the other, the debtor to reorganize its obligation under terms and conditions that are reasonably capable of being met given its commercial reality.

In the business and financial sphere, it is common for a credit or commercial obligation to fall into default for various reasons. In these cases, the challenge does not always lie solely in initiating a court claim, but in structuring legal solutions that make it possible to order the relationship between the parties, preserve the economic value of the transaction, and provide legal certainty going forward.

Within this context, debt acknowledgments and payment agreements are particularly useful legal tools. When properly designed, they make it possible to transform a default situation into a clear, enforceable, and legally sound scheme that facilitates the reorganization of the obligation and establishes precise rules for its performance.

  1. The lawyer as a business advisor

One of the keys to structuring this type of agreement is to understand that the law does not operate in isolation. Contractual obligations develop within specific commercial relationships and financial structures, which must be understood in order to provide adequate advice.

In this sense, the lawyer involved in these transactions does not merely draft legal documents. Their role also consists of understanding the client’s business, its commercial dynamics, its financial structure, and the risks involved in each transaction.

Only on the basis of that knowledge is it possible to properly support commercial decisions and design legal structures that allow negotiations or debt-restructuring processes to move forward without compromising the legal certainty of the transaction.

In many situations, the challenge is to strike a balance between two fundamental objectives:

a) enabling the economic viability of the transaction or the continuity of the commercial relationship;
b) adequately preserving the creditor’s rights

When the agreement is properly structured, both objectives can be achieved simultaneously.

  1. The importance of proper legal instrumentation

One of the most relevant aspects of these transactions is the legal instrumentation of the agreement. It is not enough for there to be a commercial understanding between the parties: that understanding must be translated into a legally sound document that complies with the applicable rules.

Proper instrumentation makes it possible to:

  1. clearly establish the debtor’s express acknowledgment of the obligation;
  2. structure realistic and legally enforceable payment plans;
  3. maintain or strengthen in rem or personal guarantees backing the debt;
  4. establish clear clauses on default, interest, acceleration, and enforcement;
  5. define precise mechanisms for communication, payment, and applicable jurisdiction.

Experience shows that many court disputes originate in poorly documented or incomplete agreements, which create uncertainty about the scope of the obligations or weaken the parties’ legal position.

For this reason, the quality of the legal instrumentation is decisive in ensuring the agreement’s real effectiveness.

In this context, preventive legal advice takes on central importance. The lawyer’s involvement at early stages—during negotiation, the restructuring of an obligation, or the definition of its payment terms—makes it possible to anticipate potential conflict scenarios and structure legal instruments that provide greater predictability and certainty for the parties.

  1. Preparing today the best document for a possible future court claim

There is also an aspect that is often underestimated: agreements must also be structured with a possible default scenario in mind.

A good agreement not only organizes the payment of a debt; it must also be designed to become, if necessary, an effective legal tool for judicial enforcement.

From a litigation standpoint, this means that the document should address fundamental matters such as:

  1. clarity in the express and unequivocal acknowledgment of the debt;
  2. the correct determination of amounts, terms, and payment conditions;
  3. the preservation of in rem or personal guarantees backing the obligation;
  4. the inclusion of default and acceleration clauses.

Under Paraguayan law, proper instrumentation of the agreement may allow the document to constitute an enforceable instrument (título ejecutivo), as provided in Article 448 of the Civil Procedure Code. However, for this to be possible, the document must be carefully structured and drafted so as to meet the legal requirements necessary for its enforceability through executory proceedings, since not just any agreement or document is sufficient to bring an executory action.

In practice, this means that the agreement must contain a clear, express, liquidated, and enforceable obligation, properly documented in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Otherwise, the document might not meet the conditions necessary to bring an executory action, forcing the creditor to resort first to a declaratory proceeding, with the resulting delays and additional costs.

This means that, in the event of a default, the creditor may directly initiate an executory proceeding to collect the debt, without first having to go through a declaratory proceeding. In practice, having an enforceable instrument can make a significant difference in terms of efficiency and speed in recovering the credit.

  1. The importance of preserving guarantees

In many debt restructurings, it is equally important to analyze the maintenance or strengthening of existing guarantees, such as mortgages, pledges, sureties, or joint co-debtorships.

Proper structuring of the agreement should aim to preserve these guarantees or adapt them to the new terms of the credit, so as to maintain adequate legal backing for the obligation.

  1. Avoiding unintended legal effects in the restructuring

Likewise, when structuring this type of agreement, special attention must be paid to avoiding unintended legal effects, such as a novation of the original obligation, unless that is expressly sought by the parties.

In many cases, the purpose of the restructuring is merely to modify payment terms or conditions, keeping the originally assumed guarantees and obligations in force.

For this reason, the agreement must be drafted with legal precision, so as to adequately reflect the parties’ intent and avoid interpretations that could weaken the creditor’s legal position.

  1. The value of preventive advice

In the business sphere, preventive legal advice remains one of the most valuable—and often underestimated—tools for risk management.

Having sound legal structures in place from the outset of a transaction, or at an early stage of renegotiation, makes it possible to significantly reduce future conflicts or, where they arise, to face them with greater legal certainty.

Clients who incorporate legal advice at the negotiation, planning, and documentation stages of their transactions tend to be in a much stronger position in the face of potential defaults.

Ultimately, a good legal structure not only resolves disputes. In many cases, it begins to prevent them long before they arise.

Cumplimiento digital en campañas promocionales en redes sociales

Asesoramos a una empresa de consumo masivo sobre los riesgos legales de una campaña promocional en redes sociales, que incluía el sorteo de una estadía en un hotel internacional y la utilización de imágenes del hotel publicadas en su página web, algunas de las cuales contenían personas, incluyendo menores de edad.

Durante el proceso, identificamos riesgos legales asociados al uso de imágenes con fines comerciales, particularmente en materia de derecho a la imagen (consentimiento de personas identificables, incluyendo menores) y utilización de activos protegidos del hotel (marca, diseño e identidad comercial). A fin de mitigar dichos riesgos, elaboramos un borrador de carta de autorización mediante la cual el hotel confirmaría contar con los derechos necesarios sobre las imágenes y con los consentimientos correspondientes, otorgando a la empresa un marco jurídico seguro para su utilización en la campaña.

Este caso refleja la importancia del cumplimiento digital preventivo, asegurando que las campañas online se desarrollen de manera segura y protegiendo la reputación de la marca en entornos digitales altamente visibles.

Tax News – March 2026

Executive Summary

Marzo 2026
RegulaciónDateContent
General Resolution No. 47/2026March 10, 2026It is hereby established that it is mandatory to provide information to the DNIT regarding transactions conducted with cryptoassets.
General Resolution No. 48/2026March 23, 2026Due to system failures in Marangatú, the filing deadlines for final and informational tax returns have been extended on an exceptional basis.
General Resolution No. 49/2026March 24, 2026Provisions are established for the disclosure of information on earnings, reserves, and distributable earnings in the Notes to the Financial Statements of obligated taxpayers (Obligation 948).

► General Resolution No. 47/2026 – Obligation to report transactions involving cryptoassets.

The National Tax Revenue Directorate (“DNIT”) issued General Resolution No. 47/2026, dated March 10, 2026, establishing for the first time in Paraguay the formal obligation to provide information on transactions involving cryptoassets. The measure does not create a new tax, but rather an information reporting obligation aimed at strengthening transparency and tax oversight in a sector of growing economic importance.

The regulation broadly defines the concept of a cryptoasset, encompassing any digital representation of value based on distributed ledger technology (“blockchain”), including value tokens, utility tokens, stablecoins, and NFTs, among others. Digital currencies issued by central banks (“CBDCs”) and financial instruments regulated by securities market laws are excluded.

The following are required to file the Informative Affidavit on Cryptoassets (“DJI – Cryptoassets”): (a) the owners, administrators, or managers of cryptoasset platforms operating in the country; and (b) individuals, legal entities, and other entities resident or incorporated in the country that trade in cryptoassets, when the annual transaction amount exceeds USD 5,000, whether through non-resident platforms or without the intermediation of any platform.

The minimum required information includes, for each transaction: date and time, identification of the parties involved—or wallet addresses—type of cryptoasset, amount traded, gross value in dollars, fees, and the transaction hash. The filing must be made annually through the Marangatú System, within three months following the close of the fiscal year. The first filing will correspond to the 2026 fiscal year and must be submitted in March 2027 for taxpayers with a fiscal year-end of December 31.

Reportable entities must include Obligation 959 – DJI Cryptoassets in their RUC. Late filing will be penalized with a fine of ₲ 1,000,000 for non-compliance. It should be noted that the resolution is not retroactive. If you would like to learn more, we have prepared a more detailed article, which you can find here.

► General Resolution No. 48/2026 – Exceptional extension of deadlines due to system failures at Marangatú.

On March 23, 2026, the Marangatú system experienced significant outages due to cuts in the fiber-optic network, which affected connectivity at the DNIT data center. The outage coincided with a day of high tax volume, with multiple filing deadlines scheduled for that day.

In response to this situation, the DNIT issued General Resolution No. 48/2026, which exceptionally extended the filing deadlines for final and informational tax returns from March 23 to March 24, 2026, in order to avoid harm to taxpayers who were unable to complete their filings on time.

According to Internal Revenue General Manager Éver Otazú, the system did not go down completely, but it did experience slowness and intermittent outages. Cuts were detected at two points in the fiber-optic network, allegedly linked to acts of vandalism, which were repaired during the day. This is not the first time the DNIT has faced this type of issue, as thefts of fiber-optic cables have also been reported on previous occasions.

► DNIT General Resolution No. 49/2026 – New requirements for disclosing information on profits, reserves, and distributable earnings in financial statements.

Through General Resolution No. 49/2026, issued on March 24, 2026, the DNIT ruled that Corporate Income Tax (“IRE”) taxpayers required to file financial statements under Obligation 948 must include in the Notes to the Financial Statements detailed information on the composition and allocation of retained earnings and accumulated results.

The measure applies to financial statements for periods ending on or after December 31, 2025, and aims to strengthen control mechanisms and transparency in the accounting information submitted to the tax authorities. Specifically, the Notes to the Financial Statements must contain, at a minimum: (a) a reconciliation of retained earnings (net income for the year, prior-period results, and adjustments); (b) an identification of distributable earnings; and (c) a breakdown of the allocation of earnings, including dividends distributed, capitalized earnings, established reserves, and amounts pending distribution.

If you would like to learn more, we have prepared a more detailed article, which you can find here.

    

Régimen excepcional y transitorio para la regularización de obligaciones ante el MTESS

El Poder Ejecutivo dictó el Decreto N° 5732/2026, mediante el cual se establece un régimen excepcional y transitorio de regularización para el cumplimiento de determinadas obligaciones laborales pendientes ante el Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social (“MTESS”).

El objetivo principal del régimen es promover la formalización y el cumplimiento voluntario, permitiendo a los empleadores regularizar situaciones omitidas o deficientes sin aplicación inmediata de sanciones, antes de avanzar hacia etapas de control y cobro más gravosas.

A continuación, detallamos los aspectos más relevantes del Decreto:

  1. Ámbito temporal del régimen

El régimen excepcional entra en vigencia desde la publicación del Decreto y se extiende hasta el 31 de agosto de 2026.

Finalizado este periodo, el MTESS deberá gestionar el cobro judicial de todas las deudas pendientes.

  1. Obligaciones que pueden regularizarse sin multa

Durante este período, los empleadores podrán regularizar obligaciones pendientes sin aplicación de multas por mora, incluyendo:

  • Inscripción en el Registro Obrero Patronal (casa matriz y sucursales)
  • Comunicaciones laborales obligatorias, tales como:
    • Entrada y salida de trabajadores
    • Licencias y permisos
    • Vacaciones
    • Sanciones disciplinarias
    • Accidentes de trabajo y enfermedades profesionales
    • Ausencias
    • Preavisos

Esto aplica a obligaciones previstas en el marco del Decreto N° 1989/2024.

  1. Reducción de multas existentes

El Decreto también establece beneficios para multas ya impuestas:

  • 50% de reducción para multas firmes generadas entre el 1 de enero de 2020 y la entrada en vigencia del Decreto, siempre que:
    • Se cancelen o
    • Se inicie su pago durante la vigencia del régimen
  • 70% de reducción para empleadores con 1 a 30 trabajadores al 31 de diciembre de 2025

  1. Facilidades de pago

Se habilita el pago fraccionado de multas:

  • Hasta 10 cuotas iguales
  • Con una entrega inicial mínima del 20%

Además, empleadores con planes de pago vigentes podrán acceder a los beneficios de reducción si optan por cancelar el saldo total.

  1. Limitaciones del régimen
  • El régimen no aplica a otros incumplimientos laborales no expresamente contemplados en el Decreto, los cuales seguirán siendo sancionados conforme a la normativa vigente.
  • La cancelación de multas con reducciones no exime del cumplimiento de las obligaciones laborales y registrales previstas en el Decreto N° 1989/2024.
  • Finalizado el régimen, el MTESS deberá impulsar el cobro judicial de las deudas pendientes sin excepción.

  1. Implicancias prácticas

Este régimen representa una oportunidad estratégica para regularizar obligaciones laborales pendientes, reducir contingencias y alinear la situación del empleador con los sistemas de control del MTESS, antes del inicio de una etapa de fiscalización y cobro más estricta.

Resulta especialmente relevante para:

  • Empleadores con registros incompletos o desactualizados
  • Empresas con multas acumuladas entre 2020 y la entrada en vigencia del Decreto
  • Micro y pequeñas empresas que requieran alivio financiero para normalizar su situación

This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific assistance regarding the application of this regulation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Resolución MTESS N° 220/2026: Reglamentación operativa del régimen laboral y de seguridad social para MIPYMES.

El Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social (“MTESS”) emitió la Resolución N° 220/2026 (la “Resolución), mediante la cual se reglamentan los aspectos operativos del régimen laboral y de seguridad social aplicable a las Micro, Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas (MIPYMES), previsto en la Ley N° 7444/2025 y su Decreto Reglamentario N° 4535/2025.

La Resolución introduce procedimientos, controles y plazos concretos para la aplicación del régimen especial de contratación a plazo determinado y, en el caso de las microempresas, del régimen salarial especial del 80% del salario mínimo.

A continuación, destacamos los principales puntos de la Resolución.

  1. Contratos de trabajo a plazo determinado para MIPYMES

Las Microempresas (MIE) y Pequeñas Empresas (PE) pueden celebrar contratos de trabajo a plazo determinado, con las siguientes reglas clave:

  • Duración máxima:
    • Hasta 12 meses, prorrogables
    • Con un tope total de 36 meses, considerando prórrogas.
  • Superado ese plazo, o ante incumplimientos formales, la relación se considerará por tiempo indefinido.

  1. Requisitos formales del contrato

El contrato debe celebrarse por escrito y contener, como mínimo:

  • Datos completos del empleador y del trabajador.
  • Identificación de la categoría MIPYMES y Cédula MIPYMES vigente.
  • Descripción del puesto, jornada y lugar de trabajo.
  • Remuneración pactada (con indicación expresa cuando se aplique el régimen del 80%).
  • Fecha de inicio y vencimiento del contrato.
  • Firma de las partes.

El cumplimiento de estos requisitos es condición indispensable para acceder y mantener los beneficios del régimen especial.

  1. Registro obligatorio ante el MTESS
  • El contrato debe ser registrado en el MTESS dentro de los 5 días hábiles desde su firma, a través del Sistema de Registro Obrero Patronal (REOP).
  • Las prórrogas o adendas deben presentarse con al menos 10 días corridos de anticipación al vencimiento del contrato vigente.
  • La falta de registro impide la aplicación del régimen especial.

  1. Verificación y control administrativo

El MTESS verificará los contratos y sus prórrogas en plazos breves:

  • 2 días hábiles para la revisión inicial.
  • 3 días hábiles para subsanar observaciones, en caso de existir.
  • Si no se regulariza la situación, no se habilita el régimen especial contractual ni salarial.

  1. Régimen salarial especial para Microempresas (80% del salario mínimo)

Exclusivo para Microempresas (MIE):

  • Permite abonar una remuneración no inferior al 80% del salario mínimo legal, por un plazo máximo de 36 meses, computados desde la fecha de emisión de la Cédula MIPYMES.
  • La vigencia del beneficio está condicionada a:
  • Mantener la categoría de Microempresa.
  • Tener el contrato debidamente registrado y validado por el MTESS.
  • El beneficio no es aplicable a Pequeñas Empresas.

  1. Limitaciones y controles sobre el régimen salarial

No se podrá aplicar el régimen del 80% cuando:

  • El trabajador ya haya tenido vínculo previo con el mismo empleador.
  • El trabajador haya percibido, en los últimos 12 meses, remuneraciones iguales o superiores al salario mínimo legal.
  • El trabajador ya haya sido beneficiario del régimen especial durante el plazo máximo permitido, aun con otro empleador.

Los controles se realizan de forma automática, mediante la interoperabilidad entre el MTESS, IPS y MIC.

  1. Coordinación con el IPS e interoperabilidad
  • La aplicación del régimen salarial especial ante el IPS queda supeditada a la validación favorable del contrato por el MTESS.
  • Si el contrato no se presenta, no se valida o se rechaza, el empleador será comunicado como “NO CUMPLE”, y deberá ajustarse al régimen general de cotización.
  • El sistema incorpora alertas automáticas para el empleador.

  1. Modelos oficiales de contrato

La Resolución aprueba modelos oficiales de:

  • Contrato a plazo determinado (MIE y PE).
  • Contrato con aplicación del régimen salarial del 80% (MIE).
  • Adenda o prórroga contractual.

Su utilización facilita la verificación administrativa, aunque no excluye el control de fondo por parte del MTESS.

  1. Régimen transitorio

Para empresas con Cédula MIPYMES emitida antes de la vigencia de la Resolución:

  • El plazo máximo de 36 meses comenzará a computarse 15 días después de la publicación de la Resolución, como período de adecuación, a partir del cual comenzará a computarse el plazo máximo del régimen especial.

Implicancias prácticas

Esta reglamentación refuerza los controles formales, los plazos de registro y la trazabilidad de los contratos bajo el régimen MIPYMES.
Resulta clave que las empresas:

  • Utilicen contratos correctamente instrumentados.
  • Cumplan estrictamente con los plazos de registro y prórroga.
  • Verifiquen su categoría MIPYMES vigente.

Todo ello con el fin de evitar la pérdida de beneficios y contingencias laborales o previsionales. En particular, el incumplimiento de los requisitos formales o de registro puede derivar en la aplicación del régimen laboral y previsional general.

This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific assistance regarding the application of this regulation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Update to the General Regulation of Paraguay’s Payment Systems (SIPAP)

Through Resolution No. 2, Minutes No. 12 dated March 12, 2026, the Central Bank of Paraguay (the “BCP”) approved the new General Regulation of Paraguay’s Payment Systems (SIPAP), introducing a comprehensive update to the regulatory framework applicable to payment systems in the country, in line with Law No. 7503/2025 on the National Payment System (the “Regulation”).

From a structural standpoint, the Regulation organizes the operation of SIPAP into four main components: (i) general rules; (ii) the regime applicable to the Central Securities Depository (DEPO); (iii) specific provisions for the Real-Time Gross Settlement System (RTGS), the Automated Clearing House (ACH), and the Instant Payment System (IPS); and (iv) the operational rules of the Instant Payment System (IPS).

One of the most relevant aspects of the update is the expansion of the scope of participants. The Regulation expressly includes capital markets entities and payment service providers, including those that initiate payments.

In addition, new tools are incorporated, such as the QR Hub and digital savings deposit certificates (CDA-d), which are part of the initiatives promoted by the BCP to modernize the financial infrastructure.

The new regulatory framework also strengthens participants’ obligations, particularly in relation to information security, risk management, business continuity, and fraud prevention. In this regard, entities are required not only to comply with more demanding technical and operational standards, but also to ensure the availability and efficiency of the payment services offered to users.

Update to the registration regime for insurance intermediaries in Paraguay

Through Resolution SS.SG. No. 031/2026 dated January 30, 2026 (the “Resolution”), subsequently expanded by Resolution SS.SG. No. 117/2026 dated March 23, 2026, the Superintendence of Insurance (the “SIS”) approved an update to the registration and license renewal regime for insurance intermediaries and loss adjusters, introducing relevant changes to the requirements, timelines, and conditions applicable to the performance of such activities in Paraguay.

Under the new regime, applications for registration and renewal must be submitted in accordance with the deadlines, periods, and conditions established by the SIS through its institutional web platform.

For this purpose, registration will be opened once per calendar year, subject to limited quotas defined in each call, while renewals may be opened four times per year. The opening periods will be communicated by Circular, and the authority will have up to sixty (60) calendar days from the closing of each period to decide on the approval or rejection of the applications.

All information and documentation submitted in connection with registration or renewal processes must be filed exclusively through the institutional platform and will be deemed to have the status of an affidavit, with the applicant being responsible for its truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness.

In addition, licenses will be valid for up to three (3) years, except in the case of first-time registration, where the SIS may establish a different term to align expiration dates with the renewal schedule.

As a new development, applicants are required to disclose, under affidavit and through the institutional platform, all digital profiles used for commercial purposes (including social media accounts, websites, or other digital channels), providing the corresponding links and confirming that no other profiles related to the regulated activity exist. Such profiles must be publicly accessible to allow monitoring by the authority, and any false, incomplete, or inaccurate information may result in the rejection of the application, without prejudice to applicable sanctions.

Additionally, through Resolution SS.SG. No. 117/2026, the SIS introduced transitional measures to facilitate the implementation of the new regime during the 2026–2027 period. Certain requirements are temporarily relaxed, allowing the submission of either surety bonds or professional liability insurance policies for agents and brokers, and deferring the requirement for valid licenses for signatories acting on behalf of legal entities until January 1, 2028.

Finally, the regulation provides that granted licenses may lapse one year after issuance if the agent, broker, or loss adjuster does not carry out activities related to the authorized business within that period, unless a duly justified reason is provided and accepted by the SIS.

Expansion of the use of the Agent Registration Tool (HRA) in the Securities Market

Through Circular SV.SG. No. 002/2026 dated March 3, 2026 (the “Circular”), the Superintendence of Securities (the “SIV”) announced the expansion of the scope of its electronic registry platform known as the Agent Registration Tool (the “HRA”).

In particular, the Circular introduced two new procedures that must be processed through this platform:

  • the registration of issued and fully paid book-entry shares; and
  • the registration of book-entry shares for public offering.

It is worth noting that the implementation of this new modality does not introduce any changes to the documentary requirements established under the applicable Securities Market regulations. Accordingly, market participants must continue to comply with the relevant regulatory requirements for such filings, with the change being exclusively procedural in terms of the submission channel.

Additionally, the SIV issued a detailed guideline for agent registration, which outlines the process for submitting information, uploading documentation, and finalizing applications through the HRA system.

Finally, the Circular is currently in force, having become mandatory as of March 4, 2026.

Asesoramiento integral en proceso de escisión corporativa (spin-off) para empresa líder en producción de hormigón

1. Resumen Ejecutivo

Vouga brindó asesoramiento legal integral a una empresa líder en el sector de producción de hormigón en el marco de un proceso complejo de división societaria (spin-off). La operación implicó la reorganización de la estructura corporativa existente mediante la creación de tres nuevas sociedades independientes, cada una enfocada en una línea de negocio específica.

El objetivo principal de la transacción fue optimizar la eficiencia operativa, fortalecer la competitividad y permitir una gestión estratégica diferenciada para cada unidad de negocio. La intervención de Vouga abarcó desde el diseño jurídico de la operación hasta la elaboración de la documentación societaria esencial y el aseguramiento del cumplimiento normativo aplicable.

2. Contexto del Cliente

El cliente es una compañía líder en la producción de hormigón, con operaciones consolidadas y presencia relevante en su mercado. El crecimiento sostenido y la diversificación de sus actividades habían generado una estructura corporativa compleja, con múltiples líneas de negocio coexistiendo bajo una misma entidad jurídica.

Ante este escenario, la compañía identificó la necesidad de reorganizar su estructura societaria para mejorar la toma de decisiones, asignar recursos de manera más eficiente y acompañar su estrategia de crecimiento a mediano y largo plazo.

3. Desafíos del Proyecto

El proceso presentó diversos desafíos legales y operativos, entre ellos:

  • Diseño de una estructura de escisión eficiente, que permitiera separar claramente activos, pasivos y operaciones sin afectar la continuidad del negocio.
  • Coordinación de múltiples líneas de negocio, cada una con particularidades operativas y regulatorias.
  • Elaboración de estatutos sociales adecuados para las tres nuevas entidades, reflejando su objeto, gobierno corporativo y necesidades específicas.
  • Cumplimiento estricto del marco normativo aplicable, incluyendo normativa societaria, contractual y regulatoria.
  • Minimización de riesgos legales y operativos durante la transición.

4. Alcance del Asesoramiento Legal

El rol de Vouga fue integral y estratégico, e incluyó, entre otros aspectos:

  • Asesoramiento en la reorganización societaria, alineando la operación con los objetivos de negocio del cliente.
  • Redacción y revisión de la documentación legal clave, incluyendo:
    • Estatutos sociales de las tres nuevas sociedades.
    • Documentos corporativos necesarios para la implementación de la escisión.
  • Análisis y aseguramiento del cumplimiento normativo, velando por la adecuación de la operación a la legislación aplicable.
  • Acompañamiento legal durante todo el proceso de implementación, coordinando con los equipos internos del cliente y sus contadores.}

5. Solución Implementada

Se diseñó e implementó un proceso de escisión en virtud del cual la sociedad original se reorganizó en tres entidades jurídicas independientes, cada una dedicada a una línea de negocio específica.

La nueva estructura permitió:

  • Una mayor claridad organizacional y patrimonial.
  • Gobiernos corporativos adaptados a la realidad y necesidades de cada negocio.
  • Una gestión operativa más eficiente y especializada.

6. Resultados y Beneficios para el Cliente

Como resultado del proceso, el cliente puede lograr:

  • Incrementar la eficiencia operativa, al contar con estructuras societarias más ágiles y enfocadas.
  • Mejorar su competitividad, permitiendo que cada unidad de negocio se desarrolle con mayor autonomía estratégica.
  • Reducir riesgos legales y operativos, gracias a una implementación ordenada y conforme a derecho.
  • Sentar bases sólidas para el crecimiento futuro, facilitando potenciales inversiones, alianzas o nuevas reorganizaciones.

El enfoque práctico, estratégico y orientado a resultados permitió transformar una necesidad corporativa compleja en una solución jurídica eficiente y generadora de valor.

Este estudio de caso ha sido elaborado con fines ilustrativos y preservando la confidencialidad del cliente.